Exactly four years ago, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the Wall Israel
is constructing in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), along with Israeli settlements,
is illegal and that Israel consequently must undo it and its effects. Consequently, the
Court ruled that Israel is obligated to cease the Wall’s construction, tear down any parts
already completed, and provide reparations for any damages caused by the construction.
Since then, Israel has taken no steps to abide by the Court’s decision. On the contrary,
Israel has flouted the Court’s authority, continuing to erect the Wall, completing around
60% of its 701 kilometers, and transferring thousands of settlers to the oPt within that
period alone.
The Court also held that third states have an obligation not to recognize or assist the
situation arising from the Wall’s construction and to ensure that Israel complies with its legal obligations. Yet, in the four years since the Court’s decision, not nearly enough has
been done in the face of Israel’s intransigence.
Tragically, Palestinians continue to pay the price for this lack of enforcement. For
instance, in the past three days, Israel has aggressively crushed the non-violent protests against the Wall by Palestinians from Ni’lin village, and Israeli and international
supporters, injuring dozens and imposing a four-day long curfew on the village. Ni’lin, together with its neighboring villages (Rantis, Shuqba, Qibya, and Budrus) west of
Ramallah, will soon be surrounded by walls and security roads. The 20,000 Palestinians
living in these five villages will be trapped in yet another enclave in the oPt.
More must be done to ensure that these and other Israeli violations of Palestinian human
rights do not continue for yet another year.
This fact sheet analyses the impact of the Wall and Israel’s settlement expansion.
A. Despite inaccurate Israeli claims that the Wall route “only” takes 7-8% of the
West Bank[1] the Wall and planned settlement (colony) expansion will place 45.5% of the occupied West Bank under Israeli control.
• The revised Wall route alone de facto annexes 9.0% of the West Bank.
- This figure includes the Latrun Valley and East Jerusalem, which together constitute 2.0% of the West Bank.
-
This figure also includes the Ariel and Kedumim “fingers,” which
together constitute 2.2% of the West Bank.
• Settlements “east” of the Wall de facto annex an additional 8.0% of the West Bank.
- These settlements mostly have their own fences or walls and control
large areas of Palestinian land throughout the West Bank.
• Israel’s de facto annexation of the Jordan Valley accounts for an additional
28.5% of the West Bank.
- Israeli settlements control nearly the entire Jordan valley, restricting
Palestinian land use and development.[2]
• Israel claims the Wall is about security, but the revised route, which
stretches 701 km, is more than twice the length of the 1967
border, making it much more difficult and expensive to patrol. the 701 km, some 420 km (60%) have already been completed while 52 km are under construction.
• The Wall route effectively incorporates over 414,000 illegal settlers, or 88%
of the Israeli settler population.
- The Wall facilitates the expansion of the most damaging Israeli
settlement blocs, all of which the International Court of Justice
unanimously deemed illegal on July 9, 2004.[3]
B. Percentages are deceiving: What matters are the value and location of land.
• East Jerusalem only accounts for 1.3% of the West Bank, but represents the
economic, cultural and religious capital of the oPt and is
therefore indispensable for the Palestinians.
• The Wall and settlements divest Palestinians of their water rights.
- The Ariel and Kedumim “fingers,” which stretch 22 km into the
northern West Bank, account for 2.2% of the occupied West Bank,
are part of a broad Israeli policy that prevents Palestinian
access to some of the most valuable water resources in the West
Bank.
- By incorporating many of the West Bank’s most valuable water
productive zones, Israel’s Wall and settlements an additional
mechanism to limit access to water resources, as well as pre-empt
future fair and equitable allocation of the West Bank’s water
resources, as required by international law.[4]
C. The revised Wall route effectively severs East Jerusalem from the rest of
the West Bank.
• The Wall in the Jerusalem area now de facto annexes 228.2 square km or 3.9% of
the occupied West Bank. The Wall will separate or isolate over 230,000
Palestinian Jerusalemites from the rest of the West Bank and will further
separate over 2 million Palestinians living on the “eastern” side of the Wall
from East Jerusalem.
• The Wall will de facto annex to Israel three major settlement (colony) blocs
surrounding metropolitan East Jerusalem—Givon, Adumim, and Etzion—
land critical to Palestinian population growth and economic development.
• The Wall itself facilitates the Israeli settlement project in occupied East
Jerusalem, including the Jerusalem Ring Road (and other settlement
infrastructure) which will encircle occupied East Jerusalem, strangling the
occupied City even further.
• The Wall facilitates the expansion of the Adumim settlement bloc, which
includes Ma’ale Adumim, Almon, Kefar Adumim, Mizpe Yeriho, Alon and
Qedar, as well as Mishor Adumim, an industrial settlement. The largest settlement (colony) in this bloc, Ma’ale Adumim, controls an area of 63 square km
to be incorporated on the western side of the Wall. Ma’ale Adumim’s total
municipal area is 15 times larger than its current built-up area.
- The Adumim bloc lies approximately 14 km east of the 1967 pre-occupation
border and houses over 30,000 settlers. To further strengthen contiguity between the Adumim bloc and West
Jerusalem, Israel is implementing the E-1 Plan. The Plan is for a
new Israeli settlement to be built on 12,442 dunums of the
Palestinian lands of El-Eizariya Az-Zaim, At-Tor and Issawiya. The
Plan is now slated to have 3,500 housing units (approximately 14,500 settlers), construction of which has already begun in Nof Adumim.
However, the majority of the land will be used to develop Israeli
infrastructure, including an industrial estate, ten hotels and
entertainment facilities.
- The E-1 Plan and the Adumim bloc
assure Israeli control over key junctions for all roads connecting
the northern West Bank to the south and effectively bissect the
West Bank.
- Furthermore, the E-1 Plan will prevent Palestinian
development in one of the Palestinian areas with the highest
economic potential: Once the Plan is realized, Palestinian areas of
Jerusalem will be severed from one another and the high development potential of the area will be lost, thereby threatening
the viability of the Palestinian state and its capital.
• As a result of the fragmentation of the Christian and Muslim Palestinian communities of East Jerusalem and neighboring areas, Jerusalem imminently risks losing its historic character of housing vibrant
communities of Christians, Jews and Muslims.
• The revised Wall and Jerusalem-area settlements (colonies) still sever East
Jerusalem from the neighboring communities of Bethlehem and
Ramallah. Historically, these communities have been socially, culturally and
economically interdependent. Together, these communities alone account
for between 35 per cent of the oPt’s economy, including the Gaza Strip.
- Bethlehem will be completely cut off from Jerusalem, while the
surrounding settlements of the Etzion bloc expand onto more
Palestinian land. Even after the Annapolis Conference, and
contrary to Israel’s Road Map obligations, Israel has approved the expansion of the settlements of Har Homa, Betar Illit, Gilo, Givat
HaMatos and Har Gilo by hundreds of housing units.
- The village of Walaja, west of Bethlehem, will be almost entirely
surrounded by the Wall with only a “crossing” connecting it to Bethlehem.
-
Jaba, which was previously located on the “eastern” side of the Wall
will now be added to the cluster of Palestinian villages surrounded by
the Etzion settlements that are to be incorporated on the “western” side of the Wall. Jaba will be locked in between the Wall and a settlement by-pass road and, like the other villages in this cluster, will
be deprived of free access to Bethlehem.
-
The surrounding Etzion settlements will control an area of 70.1
square km - second only in size to the Ariel settlement (colony) bloc,
which stretches 22 km into the northern West Bank. These
settlements will permanently restrict the development of
Bethlehem while fragmenting the agricultural communities on which
Bethlehem and Jerusalem rely for produce and income. The Etzion
settlements also prevent free movement of people and goods between the
villages and the cities of Bethlehem and Jerusalem, while encroaching
on cultivated areas, preventing access to fields, polluting water wells
and decimating any prospects for development. As this is the most
productive area of the Bethlehem region, the Wall and Etzion bloc
will permanently inhibit the economies of Bethlehem and East
Jerusalem.
D. Roughly 80% of the Wall lies on occupied Palestinian territory.
• On July 9, 2004, the International Court of Justice unequivocally
reaffirmed that all portions of Israel’s Wall built on occupied
territory, including East Jerusalem, as well as all of Israel’s
settlements, are illegal.[5]
• Approximately 260,000 West Bank Palestinians living in the Governorates of
Jerusalem, Jenin, Qalqilya, and Bethlehem will remain trapped between the
Wall and the 1967 pre-occupation border. This is accounts for 10.6% of the
total Palestinian population in the occupied West Bank.
• The Bethlehem-area villages of Wadi Fukin, Nahhalin, Battir, Khirbet
Zakariya, Husan and Jaba - home to approximately 19,000 Palestinians - will
be trapped between the 1967 border and the Wall. Furthermore,
with the exception of Jaba, all of these communities will beenclosed
between two Walls. This facilitates the expansion of the Etzion
settlements (colonies) while creating strong incentives for Palestinian
villagers to abandon their homes and some of the West Bank’s most valuable
lands to find livelihoods in neighboring Palestinian urban centers.
• The Wall route keeps intact the regime of “closed zones,” gates,
and permits.
- By Israeli military order, only “Israelis” - including anyone capable of
immigrating to Israel under Israel’s Law of Return - may enter, live or
work in those areas between the Wall and the 1967 pre-occupation
border, also known as “closed zones,”[6] without permits.
- This means that thousands of Palestinians trapped between the Wall
and Israel will still need to obtain and renew permits to remain in
their homes. Moreover, Palestinians living “east” of the Wall who
have property or jobs on the “western” side of the Wall will still need
to obtain and renew permits from the Israeli military to access their
fields or places of employment.
- Meanwhile, according to the terms of the military order, any person
of the Jewish faith worldwide will be able to immigrate to illegal
Israeli settlements in closed zones, without permits.[7]
Notes:
1. Israeli estimates have not disclosed the methodology behind these figures.
2. See B’TSELEM, Land Grab: Israel’s Settlement Policy in the West Bank, (May 2002), available here, last checked May 22, 2006.
3. Fourteen of fifteen justices acknowledged the illegality of Israel’s settlements in the majority opinion. See
generally, Advisory Opinion, 2004, supra at note 2. Additionally, the dissenting justice acknowledged the
settlements’ illegality in his separate declaration. See Judge Buergenthal’s declaration, ¶ 9, available here, last checked May 22, 2005.
4. For background on the issue of water in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well as a basic analysis of
Palestinian water rights under international law, please see NEGOTIATIONS SUPPORT UNIT, The Palestinian
Position on Water, available here, last checked May 22, 2006.
5.
See Advisory Opinion, ¶ 78, 2004, supra at note 2.
6. See B’TSELEM, Not All it Seems: Preventing Palestinians [sic] Access to their Lands West of the Separation Barrier in the
Tulkarm-Qalqilya Area, p.7 (2004), available here, last checked May 22
2006. For an English-language translation of the closed zone order pertaining to the Wall, see here, last checked May 22, 2006.
Similar orders address areas falling under Israeli settlement (colony) jurisdictional control. See B’TSELEM, Land
Grab: Israel’s Settlement Policy in the West Bank, (May 2002), available here, last checked May 22, 2006.
7. Ibid.